Public Administration of Investment Attractiveness and Infrastructure Development of Territories: Problems and Decisions
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-9-29-35
Abstract
In the article questions of public administration of investment attractiveness of territories are considered. It is shown that among problematic issues are digitalization, staffing and infrastructure development. The conclusion that creation of the preferential tax modes limits possibilities of bodies of authority and management on implementation of infrastructure projects that demands new approaches is drawn. Possibilities of use of an infrastructure mortgage as tool for development and reconstruction of infrastructure facilities are analyzed.
About the Author
S. N. Miroshnikov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Deputy Director of the Expert-Analytical Center for Regional Studies of Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (Moscow, Russian Federation), PhD in Physics and Mathematics, Associate Professor;
Russian Federation
Deputy Director of the Expert-Analytical Center for Regional Studies of Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (Moscow, Russian Federation), PhD in Physics and Mathematics, Associate Professor;
References
1. Bukhvald E. M., Ivanov O. B. Economic security of Russia and strategy of spatial development // STAGE: economic theory, analysis, practice [ETAP: ekonomicheskaya teoriya, analiz, praktika]. 2017. N 3. P. 7–22. (In rus)
2. Zeldner A.G. Conditions and incentives of functioning of territories of the advancing social and economic development // Economy and entrepreneurship [Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo]. 2017. N 5–2. P. 171–176. (In rus)
3. Miroshnikov S.N., Charkina E.S. Partnership of the power and business: how to increase efficiency of investment projects // Economy and entrepreneurship [Ekonomika i predprinimatel’stvo]. 2016. N 12 (p. 1). P. 389–397. (In rus)
4. Miroshnikov S.N., Charkina E.S. Rating of investment attractiveness of regions // Problems of the theory and practice of management [Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya]. 2017. N 5. P. 71–81. (In rus)
5. Miroshnikov S. N., Charkina E. S. Engineering and municipal infrastructure as the most important element of investment appeal of regions of Russia // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2016. N 7. P. 72–80. (In rus)
6. Charkina E.S., Miroshnikov S.N. Improvement of investment climate as main call of regional development // Economy and management [Ekonomika i upravlenie]. 2016. N 6. P. 13–17. (In rus)
Review
For citations:
Miroshnikov S.N. Public Administration of Investment Attractiveness and Infrastructure Development of Territories: Problems and Decisions. Administrative Consulting. 2018;(9):29-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2018-9-29-35
Views:
464
Email this article 