Assess the Maturity of Organization’s Project Management
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-7-50-55
Abstract
The article considers the models of evaluation of organizational maturity of project management, analyzes their advantages and disadvantages. The model of G. Kerzner’s maturity is analyzed in detail, the essence of each stage of the analysis of the organization is considered. In addition, the classification of types of personnel resistance to innovations related to project management is presented. Solutions to problems at different levels of maturity are proposed. Attention is focused on the factors that ensure the success of project management.
About the Authors
M. N. Rudenko
Perm State National Research University
Russian Federation
Marina N . Rudenko, Head of the Chair of Entrepreneurship and Economic Security, Doctor of Science (Economics), Associate Professor, Perm, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Marina N . Rudenko, Head of the Chair of Entrepreneurship and Economic Security, Doctor of Science (Economics), Associate Professor, Perm, Russian Federation
Yu. D. Subbotina
Perm State National Research University
Russian Federation
Yulia D. Subbotina, Associate Professor of the Chair of Entrepreneurship and Economic Security, PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Perm, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yulia D. Subbotina, Associate Professor of the Chair of Entrepreneurship and Economic Security, PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Perm, Russian Federation
References
1. Baklanova Yu. O. Evolution of approach to innovations project management: initiative, project, program, portfolio // Modern technologies of management [Sovremennye tekhnologii upravleniya]. 2012. N 3. P. 1–8. (In rus)
2. Zolochevskaya E.Yu., Krivosheeva T. D. Functional characteristic of the Russian control system of the state projects // Questions of management [Voprosy upravleniya]. 2014. N 6. P. 42–49. (In rus)
3. Isaev V. V. Organization of work of the project team. SPb. : Business press, 2016. 360 p. (In rus)
4. Kerzner G. Strategic planning for project management with use of model of a maturity. M., 2016. (In rus)
5. Martin P., Tate K. Project management. SPb. : Piter, 2016. 224 p. (In rus)
6. Rudenko M. N., Subbotina Yu. D. Benmarking as instrument of improving competitiveness of the region // Vth Russian scientific and practical conference “Activization of Intellectual and Resource Potential of Regions” / Baikal State University. Irkutsk, 2019. P. 23–33. (In rus)
Review
For citations:
Rudenko M.N., Subbotina Yu.D. Assess the Maturity of Organization’s Project Management. Administrative Consulting. 2019;(7):50-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-7-50-55
Views:
953
Email this article 