For the Anniversary of the Union State: Some Economic Parameters and Political Restraints
https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-12-10-16
Abstract
The article considers some results of economic integration of Russia and Belarus. It is shown that despite all discussions and disputes, a powerful integration core has been formed, the importance of which cannot be overestimated. At the same time, the problems of European integration show us the need to take into account both European and own mistakes. The most serious problem would be stopping integration and ignoring those opportunities provided by the EAEU.
About the Authors
V. A. Shamakhov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir A.Shamakhov, Director
Doctor of Science (Economics), PhD in History, Professor
N. M. Mezhevich
Saint-Petersburg State University,
Institute of Europe of Russian Academy of Science
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Nikolay M. Mezhevich, Professor
Chief Researcher
Doctor of Science (Economics), Professor
References
1. Brovka U.P. Republic of Belarus in conditions of integration // Belarusian Journal of International Law and International Relations [Belorusskii zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo prava i mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii]. N 2. P. 3–5. (In rus)
2. Geimbukh N. G. The 19th-century theory of German constitutionalists on the state structure of Germany // Journal of the Tomsk State University. Law [Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Pravo]. 2018. N 30. P. 26–33. (In rus)
3. Eurasian Union: a challenge for the European Union and Eastern Partnership states. Vilnius, Center for Eastern European Studies. 2012. (In rus)
4. Ellinek G. General teaching of the state. The law of the modern state. SPb., 1908. (In rus)
5. Libman A. M. Lessons of the European Union? Eurasian integration and the “global scenario” // Contours of global transformation: politics, economy, law [Kontury global’nykh transformatsii: politika, ekonomika, pravo]. 2019. V. 12, N 2. P. 247–268. (In rus)
6. Maksimtsev I. A., Mezhevich N. M. Economic Integration in Greate Eurasia: Opportunities and Challenges // News of St. Petersburg State Economic University [Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta]. 2018. N 3. P. 7–10. (In rus)
7. Matsevilo A. E. Reincarnation of multipolarity // Belarusian Thought [Belaruskaya dumka]. 2014. N 5. P. 41–47. (In rus)
8. Shamakhov V. A., Maksimtsev I. A., Mezhevich N. M. Foreign Economic Relations of Russia and Belarus: some objective opportunities and subjective obstacles to development // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2019. N 10. P. 8–16. (In rus)
9. Shamakhov V. A., Mezhevich N. M. Analysis of the economic model of the Republic of Belarus: the context of the Baltic States // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2018. N 11. P. 35–43. (In rus)
10. Shamakhov V. A., Mezhevich N. M. Foreign Policy Cooperation in the Practices of the Union State and Challenges of International Policy // Administrative Consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2018. N 10. P. 11–18. (In rus)
11. Shamakhov V. A., Mezhevich N. M. The problem of sovereignty and economic decision-making in the Union State: some issues of theory and practice 2018–2019 // Administrative consulting [Upravlencheskoe konsul’tirovanie]. 2019. N 2. P. 8–15. (In rus)
12. Shishkov Yu. Integration: Is Western European experience suitable for us? // Social sciences and modernity [Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’]. 1992. N 5. P. 46–58. (In rus)
Review
For citations:
Shamakhov V.A., Mezhevich N.M. For the Anniversary of the Union State: Some Economic Parameters and Political Restraints. Administrative Consulting. 2019;(12):10-16. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2019-12-10-16
Views:
456
Email this article 