Official Reporting of Religious Organizations as a Source of Empirical Data on the Activities of the Church: Some Questions of Theory and Practice of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Sweden

The relevance of any material offered to the scientific and expert community depends on many factors. Objectively, the presence of this or that issue in the center of public attention has a positive effect on the actualization of this or that article. However, there is an obvious danger. Academic approaches that accidentally find themselves in resonance with global trends can fall victim to political conjuncture. Relevance in this case can fall victim to the political moment. Moreover, this or that topic, being in the center of public discussion, negatively affects the academic understanding of the problem. All this fully relates to the question of the relationship between the state and the church in modern Europe and Russia.

A few words about global trends. Their essence boils down to the growing confrontation between supporters of new ideological approaches and traditionalists, among whom are many adherents.

The relationship between religion and the state testifies to the fact that states and societies have not yet learned to draw an effective line between their interests and those of adherents. This fact presupposes careful state and public participation in the affairs of the church. However, acknowledging this circumstance is not enough. The state must clearly know what, where and how is happening in the church sphere of the life of society in cases where church affairs can affect public and state security.

It is also known that almost all the leading churches, to a greater or lesser extent, provide official reporting to the state. However, working with this reporting, its scientific analysis is not always representative.

Objective. The presented article is aimed at a partial solution of the problem of increasing the effectiveness of academic research of the church` activities. Moreover, it is made based on official church statistics.

The author’s position is the following. States and societies have no right to let go of this vital sphere of life. The functions of the state, in this case, are at least controlling. The ineffective execution of its functions by the state can be revealed in many countries of the world. The situation in France is nothing more than a reference case of a problem that, to one degree or another, exists in most of the countries of the world, which are distinguished by ethnic and confessional heterogeneity.

1. Agafoshin M. M., Gorokhov S. A. The influence of foreign migration on the formation of the confessional structure of the population of Sweden // Baltic region [Baltiiskii region]. 2020. Vol. 12. N 2. P. 84–99. (In rus)

2. Balabeykina O. A. Confessional foreign regional studies as a research area // Regionology [Regionologiya]. 2020. N 1. P. 111–132. (In rus)

3. Balabeykina O. A. Religious tourism in the region: the current state and development prospects (on the example of the Volgograd region) // Bulletin of Volgograd State University. Economy [Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika]. 2020. Vol. 22. N 1. P. 83–94. (In rus)

4. Balabeykina O. A., Kuznetsova Yu. A. The influence of religion on the social and economic aspects of life (on the example of the Roman Catholic Church of the Philippines) // Pskov Regional Journal [Pskovskii regionologicheskii zhurnal]. 2020. No. 3(43). P. 58–72. (In rus)

5. Bogatova O. A., Dolgaeva E. I., Mitrofanova A. V. Activities of socially oriented organizations of the Russian Orthodox Church: regional aspects // Regionology [Regionologiya]. 2019. Vol. 27. N 3. P. 489–512. (In rus)

6. Gorokhov S. A., Agafoshin M. M. Approaches to assessing the religious affiliation of the population in geographical research // Geographical environment and living systems [Geograficheskaya sreda i zhivye sistemy]. 2020. N 2. P. 52–64. (In rus)

7. Lunkin R. N. Mechanisms of religious response to the coronavirus pandemic // Scientific and analytical bulletin of the Institute of Europe of the Russian Academy of Sciences [Nauchnoanaliticheskii vestnik Instituta Evropy RAN]. 2020. N 2 (14). P. 104–109. (In rus)

8. Lunkin R. N. Russian Orthodoxy in the face of social challenges: volunteering or Christian rehabilitation of risk groups // Bulletin of Perm University. Political science [Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Politologiya]. 2018. N 2. P. 156–171. (In rus)

9. Lunkin R. N. Statistics of European religiosity: from secularization to the triumph of identity // Scientific and analytical bulletin of the Institute of Europe of the Russian Academy of Sciences [Nauchno-analiticheskii vestnik Instituta Evropy RAN]. 2018. N 3. P. 171–178. (In rus)

10. Lunkin R. N. Strategy of work of religious associations with immigrants: from social adaptation to mission // Scientific and analytical bulletin of the Institute of Europe of the Russian Academy of Sciences [Nauchno-analiticheskii vestnik Instituta Evropy RAN]. 2019. No. 1. P. 77–83. (In rus)

11. Lunkin R. N. Church and society in Sweden: modern Swedish liberalism and conservatism // Modern Europe [Sovremennaya Evropa]. 2011. N 2 (46). P. 125–137. (In rus)

12. Lunkin R. N., Filatov S. B. International relations and the war of antitractionalism with identity // World economy and international relations [Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya]. 2020. Vol. 64. N 4. P. 5–14. (In rus)

13. Lunkin R. N., Filatov S. B. Interfaith differences in Europe and new ideological confrontations // Modern Europe [Sovremennaya Evropa]]. 2018. No. 3. P. 102–114. (In rus)

14. Manakov A. G. Transformation of the territorial structure of the confessional space of Russia in the XX — early XXI centuries // Geographical bulletin [Geograficheskii vestnik]. 2019. N 2 (49). P. 13–24. (In rus)

15. Manakov A. G., Dementiev V. S. Territorial structure of confessional space of a southeast part of the Baltic region // Baltic region [Baltiiskii region]. 2019. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 92–108. (In rus)

16. Safronov S.G. Factors of the development of the religious sphere in the post-Soviet space // Security problems of Russian society [Problemy bezopasnosti rossiiskogo obshchestva]. 2015. N 2. P. 125–131. (In rus)

17. Clarce G. Faith Matters: Faith-Based Organizations, Civil Sotiety and Development // Journal of International Development. 2006. Vol. 18. No. 6. P. 835–848.

18. Gladkiy Yu. N., Gladkiy I. Yu., Eidemiller K. Yu. Islamic diffusion in the Baltics: the fruit of European multiculturalism // Baltic Region. 2017. Vol. 9. No. 7. P. 30–44.

19. Kaariainen K. Religion and state in Finland // Nordic Journal of Religion and Society. 2011. No. 2. P. 155–171.

20. Krindatch A. D. Changing relationships between Religion, the State, and Society in Russia // GeoJournal. 2006. Vol. 67. P. 267–282.

21. Makris G., Bekridakis D. The Greek Orthodox Church and the Economic Crisis Since 2009 // International Journal for the Study of the Christian Church. 2013. Vol. 13. N 2. P. 111–132.

22. Molodikova I. N., Lyalina A. V., Emelyanova L. L. Contacts with Diasporas and Diaspora Organisations as a Key to a Successful Migrant Integration Policy in the EU // Baltic Region. 2018. Vol. 10. No. 3. P. 58–79.

23. Paроuras P. Faith through Deeds: Case Studies of a Faith-Based Humanitarian Organization // The Review of Faith and International Affairs. 2016. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 51–57.

24. Rogers M. Does religion always help the poor? Variations in religion and social class in the west and societies in the global south // Palgrave Communications. 2018. Vol. 4. N 1. P. 73.

25. Yang J. A Christian Perspective on Immigrant Integration // The Review of Faith and International Affairs. 2011. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 77–83.