POLICY AND CONSTITUTIONAL STATE
Terrorism is most often understood as the term used to describe the method by which a political organization (organized group) seeks to achieve its definite goals, mainly by intimidating a large part of society by means of systematic extreme indiscriminate violence against civilians, or selective violence against symbolic targets, to influence the government.
All the already known and possible future concepts of terrorism, as well as the official strategies for countering it, are politically preconditioned. These concepts are the result of a combination of actions or alleged intentions of terrorists, and, subsequently, the reactions of states to these manifestations of terrorism. Accordingly, any definition of terrorism known to us is determined only by the capacity of states to counteract and to prevent threats.
As for the definition of «state terrorism», the main expected competence of a state is to ensure security and stability (predictability) not only for individuals who delegated their powers to it but for other states also. That is why in a broader sense the «sovereignty» of a state should be understood as a measure of the consent of other international actors with the content and ways that given state does implement its authority.
Crimes are always committed only by people, and although it is perfectly permissible to use a fiction about State responsibility to establish collective responsibility for crimes, it seems unacceptable to use such a formal interpretation of the law for the personal impunity of perpetrators of terrorist acts. Therefore, in the modern international discourse, the term «terrorist state» is not used. Since the Nuremberg trial, the criminal responsibility for the use of government apparatus to commit crimes was individualized.
This article is devoted to the one of the burning problems of politology: political leadership. The urgency of the problem is due to the fact that the country’s leadership has determined (including in the President’s Address to the Federal Assembly in 2018) the strategic course of Russia’s development as a long-term prosperity of the Russian society in the face of a tougher fight in the international arena. The implementation of this course largely depends on the ruling elite. In this connection, there is a need to develop a system for “cultivating” talented political leaders. In 2017, the presidential project “Leaders of Russia” started in our country. Considering that this project is at the initial stage of implementation, and also realizing the large-scale consequences of this project for the future of Russia, there is a need for a thorough iterative conceptual study of this project.
A critical analysis of existing leadership concepts has been carried out and their limitations have been revealed to understand the specifics of this type of political leadership, which is characteristic for the long stable prosperity of large organized communities of people. The necessity of developing a new concept allowing to reveal the content of a modern form of effective political leadership is grounded.
On the basis of system analysis, the author’s concept of political leadership in Russia is proposed. The starting point of the study is the theoretical proposition that in each period of the development of society there is an effective type of political leadership. It can be assumed that at the present stage of the development of Russian society, this type is creative organizational leadership. At the same time, the more there are organizational creative leaders in the ruling elite, the greater the likelihood of a sustained and sustained successful development of our society. The author’s descriptive dynamic model of creative organizational political leadership is presented.
POWER AND ECONOMICS
The aim of the study is to form a strategy of socio-economic development of the distribution network of consumer goods based on the time factor and forecast changes in the technological mode for the long term. In any sphere of market economy is necessary to develop the strategy for socioeconomic development, which would take into account these changes. The main changes in modern market relations concern not only technological factors caused by the «digitalization» of the economy, but also organizational and social transformations: the introduction of tools of advanced marketing concepts and principles of social capital.
The approach is proposed, according to which the principles of integration of interests of market participants and social capital, as well as the instruments of the social and ethical concept of marketing, are based on the modern development strategy of the most important area in the sphere of circulation, namely, the distribution consumer network. Failure to comply with these principles leads to social tension in financial, commercial, business and contractual relations in the distribution processes caused by the divergence of the interests of participants in the framework of strategic goals, realizing their functions and processes that accompany material and non-material flows and services, which causes high marketing and logistics costs associated with unproductive and transactional costs. The identification of the causes of social contradictions between partners of supply chains in the Russian consumer market and their economic consequences is an actual problem, the solution of which will help to increase the socioeconomic efficiency of the distribution policy and the satisfaction of end-users. A block diagram of the formation of an integrated value chain is proposed by introducing marketing social and ethical innovations, through which the loyalty of the subjects of market relations is achieved.
The chain of business processes of an integrated value chain can be viewed as a technological platform in which business partners are united into a single structure or a chain of creation of use value in the sphere of circulation, and its participants are integrated on the basis of unity of interests, goals, processes, functions and accompanying material processes and intangible flows. Thus, the social and economic efficiency of Russian consumer sales networks is ensured by reducing the loss of time and labor costs for business interaction and cooperation. In addition, an even greater effect can be obtained by better satisfying the final consumers and increasing the volume of trade, which leads to an increase in the marginal profit of traders.
SOCIETY AND REFORMS
A LINEA
HISTORY AND CULTURE
EURASIAN RESEARCHES
ISSN 1816-8590 (Online)